| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ? |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Date: | Wed, 9 May 2001 20:59:34 +0200 (MET DST) |
| Cc: | Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>, "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@cotw.com>, Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>, Tom Appermont <tea@sonycom.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20010509150934.B2073@bacchus.dhis.org> |
| Organization: | Technical University of Gdansk |
| Reply-to: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Ralf Baechle wrote: > It's only modutils which for correct functionality depends on the trad- > format, so I don't see any real reason for raising version requirements > for libc. That would be needed if elf(32|64)-trad(little|big)mips was specified explicitly as rtld-oformat in sysdeps/mips/mipsel/rtld-parms and sysdeps/mips/rtld-parms. Note that libc doesn't require any version of binutils at all now. This is probably bad as using pre-2.11 versions of binutils may yield weird results. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available + |
| Previous by Date: | Re: insmod problems, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?, Steven J. Hill |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |