[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?

Subject: Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?
From: Andreas Jaeger <>
Date: 09 May 2001 14:27:39 +0200
Cc: Florian Lohoff <>, Tom Appermont <>, Ralf Baechle <>,
In-reply-to: <> ("Steven J. Hill"'s message of "Wed, 09 May 2001 07:14:38 -0500")
Mail-copies-to: never
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
User-agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)
"Steven J. Hill" <> writes:

> Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > 
> > > > The whole point was to switch from our IRIX ELF flavoured binaries to
> > > > standard ABI ELF.  These two variants are close but not identical which
> > > > for example made modutils missbehave.
> > >
> I will expound a bit more. When I made the changes to fix binutils and switch
> us from the IRIX to ABI ELF flavoured binaries the default target names
> changed from 'elf[32|64][little|big]mips' to 'elf[32|64]trad[little|big]mips'
> in binutils. This has the effect of breaking linker scripts but not a whole
> lot else. These will be the new targets for MIPS/Linux work. Binaries should
> still run just fine if you compile glibc-2.2.2 with the old or new tools.
> Future work though should use the 'elf[32|64]trad[little|big]mips' targets.

Ok, I finally understand.  Can you send a new patch for glibc with an
update for the FAQ?  I'll add it this time.

 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>