| To: | Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 May 2001 21:43:13 -0300 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20010508202518.A13476@paradigm.rfc822.org>; from flo@rfc822.org on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 08:25:18PM +0200 |
| References: | <20010505144708.A12575@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20010507163210.B2381@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010508202518.A13476@paradigm.rfc822.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 08:25:18PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > > compatibility. I read the whole thread on linux-mips but i didnt get the > > > point > > > why this has to happen - If we are repairing a real bug for it. > > > > > > Could someone please elaborate on whats going on as i feel i missed ~200 > > > mails > > > discussion and i dont want to purge the whole debian archive until i know > > > what for we actually drop the compatibility. > > > > We don't. > > Could you explain a bit more - I'd like to understand the whole issue. The whole point was to switch from our IRIX ELF flavoured binaries to standard ABI ELF. These two variants are close but not identical which for example made modutils missbehave. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] 2.4.4: mmap() fails for certain legal requests, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?, Tom Appermont |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?, Florian Lohoff |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?, Tom Appermont |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |