| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ? |
| From: | Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 May 2001 20:25:18 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20010507163210.B2381@bacchus.dhis.org>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:32:10PM -0300 |
| Organization: | rfc822 - pure communication |
| References: | <20010505144708.A12575@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20010507163210.B2381@bacchus.dhis.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.15i |
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:32:10PM -0300, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 02:47:08PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> > the last days/weeks there was a repeated discussion of breaking the binary
> > compatibility. I read the whole thread on linux-mips but i didnt get the
> > point
> > why this has to happen - If we are repairing a real bug for it.
> >
> > Could someone please elaborate on whats going on as i feel i missed ~200
> > mails
> > discussion and i dont want to purge the whole debian archive until i know
> > what for we actually drop the compatibility.
>
> We don't.
>
Could you explain a bit more - I'd like to understand the whole issue.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912
Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux on a Tektronix XP217C xterm, Alan Olsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | machine types for MIPS in ELF file, Jun Sun |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Binary compatibility break understood ?, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |