| To: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question on the binutils tradlittlemips patch |
| From: | Keith M Wesolowski <wesolows@foobazco.org> |
| Date: | Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:23:01 -0700 |
| Cc: | "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@cotw.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20010422221953.A9097@nevyn.them.org>; from dan@debian.org on Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:19:53PM -0400 |
| References: | <20010418141959.A24473@nevyn.them.org> <3ADDFD6A.AD0DDE4A@cotw.com> <20010418163727.A29531@nevyn.them.org> <20010422180718.A6180@foobazco.org> <20010422221953.A9097@nevyn.them.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:19:53PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I have them working in the case I care about - no backwards > compatibility at all. We (Monta Vista) can get away with this :) > I've attached the patches. This looks like what I have come up with as well. I don't care about backward compatibility either. If someone else wants to support broken crap that's their problem; in an age where we have scripts and makefiles to rebuild entire systems from source I can't see the point of binary compatibility. -- Keith M Wesolowski <wesolows@foobazco.org> http://foobazco.org/~wesolows ------(( Project Foobazco Coordinator and Network Administrator ))------ "Nothing motivates a man more than to see his boss put in an honest day's work." -- The fortune file |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question on the binutils tradlittlemips patch, Daniel Jacobowitz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ls from fileutils-4.0.43 segfaults, Keith M Wesolowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question on the binutils tradlittlemips patch, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question on the binutils tradlittlemips patch, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |