| To: | Shay Deloya <shay@jungo.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Insmod messages and modules space |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:14:47 +0200 |
| Cc: | "'linux-mips@oss.sgi.com'" <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <01040921101605.01025@athena.home.krftech.com>; from shay@jungo.com on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:10:16PM +0200 |
| References: | <01040921101605.01025@athena.home.krftech.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:10:16PM +0200, Shay Deloya wrote: > 1.Should text segment of module after insmod be in KSEG2 or KUSEG ? > I've notices that the module address after insmod are c0... instead of 80... > Is it insmod Bug ? It's a sign of insmod working properly :) > 2. I keep getting in insmod of busybox pkg , "relocation overflow" message > especially on printk symbols , when I debug the code, changing some function > declaration from static int func () to int func() , makes the module to > insert correctly , anyone ? Two possibilities, either you're using a too old and broken version of modutils or you used inapropriate options to compile your module. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Insmod messages and modules space, Shay Deloya |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: sgiwd93 multiple disk problem, Florian Lohoff |
| Previous by Thread: | Insmod messages and modules space, Shay Deloya |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Insmod messages and modules space, Ian Soanes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |