linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Insmod messages and modules space

To: Shay Deloya <shay@jungo.com>
Subject: Re: Insmod messages and modules space
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:14:47 +0200
Cc: "'linux-mips@oss.sgi.com'" <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
In-reply-to: <01040921101605.01025@athena.home.krftech.com>; from shay@jungo.com on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:10:16PM +0200
References: <01040921101605.01025@athena.home.krftech.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:10:16PM +0200, Shay Deloya wrote:

> 1.Should text segment of module after insmod be in KSEG2 or KUSEG ? 
> I've notices that the module address after insmod are c0... instead of 80...
> Is it insmod Bug  ?

It's a sign of insmod working properly :)

> 2. I keep getting in insmod of busybox pkg , "relocation overflow" message 
> especially on printk symbols , when I debug the code, changing some function 
> declaration from static int func () to int func()  , makes the module to 
> insert correctly , anyone ?

Two possibilities, either you're using a too old and broken version of
modutils or you used inapropriate options to compile your module.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>