[Top] [All Lists]

Re: first packages for mipsel

To: "Kevin D. Kissell" <>
Subject: Re: first packages for mipsel
From: Florian Lohoff <>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 13:58:49 +0200
In-reply-to: <00a401c0be8e$cfc065a0$0deca8c0@Ulysses>; from on Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 01:43:24PM +0200
Organization: rfc822 - pure communication
References: <> <> <00a401c0be8e$cfc065a0$0deca8c0@Ulysses>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 01:43:24PM +0200, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:

> What advantage would there be to using sysmips() as opposed
> to doing the ll/sc emulation?  It seems to me that the decode path
> in the kernel would be just as fast, and there would be a single
> "ABI" for all programs - the ll/sc instructions themselves.

I dont actually care that much - I want to have a portable way
through all ISAs as debian should be userspace compatible all the way.

If there is a working ll/sc emulation fine - Currently there is none
so the only way to go TODAY is sysmips.

Florian Lohoff                     +49-5201-669912
     Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>