| To: | Keith M Wesolowski <wesolows@foobazco.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Cleanup/detection patch |
| From: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 05 Apr 2001 13:29:13 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| References: | <20010401235212.B9737@foobazco.org> <3ACA8A3B.8BBABB11@mvista.com> <20010403203055.A17365@foobazco.org> <3ACB5FD8.6B166BA6@mvista.com> <20010405004618.A30899@foobazco.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > > So we basically have an Indy-style boardcache then. I think we must > make a distinction very cleanly between caches which are under CPU > control and those which are not. The ones under CPU control use the > stuff in load_cache and the cache descriptors in mips_cpu. The > boardcaches use something like bc_ops. I don't like bc_ops idea. Usually the external cache capability is still integral part of the CPU. I favor the idea where the cache takes care of external cache dynamically, based on some parameters set up by board detection routine. > > Now if only the linux requirements for implementing pci on a new > machine were documented somewhere... > That should come soon ... Jun |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Dumb Question on Cross-Development, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: Cleanup/detection patch, Keith M Wesolowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: Cleanup/detection patch, Keith M Wesolowski |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: Cleanup/detection patch, Keith M Wesolowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |