| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Dumb Question on Cross-Development |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Apr 2001 17:10:05 +0200 |
| Cc: | Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>, "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, "MIPS/Linux List (SGI)" <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010403112218.25523B-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:26:11AM +0200 |
| References: | <20010402234850.B25228@paradigm.rfc822.org> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010403112218.25523B-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:26:11AM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > Cross-compilation is IMHO so broken when it comes to userspace > > than noone really thinking of having something reusable would > > consider this. It all ends beeing a really ugly hack. > > I disagree. It's not that userland cross-compilation is broken. It's > just the matter of certain programmers who do not care to write > scripts/Makefiles to support cross-development portably. They might even > not realize there exists such a feature as cross-compilation. Brokeness starts with autoconf's AC_CHECK_SIZEOF macro implementation which is used frequently throughout a whole distribution and there are so many test that require actually execution of code on the target that fix a whole distribution for crosscompilation and keeping it uptodate is seriously double-plus un-fun. Ralf |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Binutils fixed to deal with 'insmod' issue and discussion..., Steven J. Hill |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Binutils fixed to deal with 'insmod' issue and discussion..., Steven J. Hill |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Dumb Question on Cross-Development, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Dumb Question on Cross-Development, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |