linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sign extended 64bit address

To: Brady Brown <bbrown@ti.com>
Subject: Re: Sign extended 64bit address
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:10:18 +0100
Cc: SGI news group <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
In-reply-to: <3AB8DDCE.CA0F16BC@ti.com>; from bbrown@ti.com on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:58:54AM -0700
References: <3AB7EFF7.A20E4FF3@ti.com> <20010321050407.A3261@bacchus.dhis.org> <3AB8DDCE.CA0F16BC@ti.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:58:54AM -0700, Brady Brown wrote:

> > > I have run into the earlier mentioned problem of objcopy not correctly
> > > dealing with the sign extended 64 bit address generated by the new
> > > tools. Is there an update on this issue? Any good work-arounds or short
> > > time solutions?
> >
> > I don't have your old report at hand but somewhen during the past year
> > binutils received a number of fixes related to signed/unsigned addresses,
> > so you should try a recent copy of binutils.
> 
> I'm currently using binutils-2.10.91-2 from Maciej's site. Is there a later
> rev that I should look at?

I was believing that that one is good; can you resend your bugreport
about the sign extension problem?  Thanks.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>