Re: Sign extended 64bit address

[Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>]

On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:58:54AM -0700, Brady Brown wrote:

> > > I have run into the earlier mentioned problem of objcopy not correctly
> > > dealing with the sign extended 64 bit address generated by the new
> > > tools. Is there an update on this issue? Any good work-arounds or short
> > > time solutions?
> >
> > I don't have your old report at hand but somewhen during the past year
> > binutils received a number of fixes related to signed/unsigned addresses,
> > so you should try a recent copy of binutils.
> 
> I'm currently using binutils-2.10.91-2 from Maciej's site. Is there a later
> rev that I should look at?

I was believing that that one is good; can you resend your bugreport
about the sign extension problem?  Thanks.

  Ralf