| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Sign extended 64bit address |
| From: | Brady Brown <bbrown@ti.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:58:54 -0700 |
| Cc: | SGI news group <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com> |
| Organization: | Texas Instruments |
| References: | <3AB7EFF7.A20E4FF3@ti.com> <20010321050407.A3261@bacchus.dhis.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:04:07PM -0700, Brady Brown wrote: > > > I have run into the earlier mentioned problem of objcopy not correctly > > dealing with the sign extended 64 bit address generated by the new > > tools. Is there an update on this issue? Any good work-arounds or short > > time solutions? > > I don't have your old report at hand but somewhen during the past year > binutils received a number of fixes related to signed/unsigned addresses, > so you should try a recent copy of binutils. > > Ralf I'm currently using binutils-2.10.91-2 from Maciej's site. Is there a later rev that I should look at? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Recommended toolchain, Keith M Wesolowski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Sign extended 64bit address, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Sign extended 64bit address, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Sign extended 64bit address, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |