Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:04:07PM -0700, Brady Brown wrote:
> > I have run into the earlier mentioned problem of objcopy not correctly
> > dealing with the sign extended 64 bit address generated by the new
> > tools. Is there an update on this issue? Any good work-arounds or short
> > time solutions?
> I don't have your old report at hand but somewhen during the past year
> binutils received a number of fixes related to signed/unsigned addresses,
> so you should try a recent copy of binutils.
I'm currently using binutils-2.10.91-2 from Maciej's site. Is there a later
rev that I should look at?