linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sign extended 64bit address

To: Brady Brown <bbrown@ti.com>
Subject: Re: Sign extended 64bit address
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:04:07 +0100
Cc: SGI news group <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
In-reply-to: <3AB7EFF7.A20E4FF3@ti.com>; from bbrown@ti.com on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:04:07PM -0700
References: <3AB7EFF7.A20E4FF3@ti.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:04:07PM -0700, Brady Brown wrote:

> I have run into the earlier mentioned problem of objcopy not correctly
> dealing with the sign extended 64 bit address generated by the new
> tools. Is there an update on this issue? Any good work-arounds or short
> time solutions?

I don't have your old report at hand but somewhen during the past year
binutils received a number of fixes related to signed/unsigned addresses,
so you should try a recent copy of binutils.

   Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>