| To: | Karel van Houten <K.H.C.vanHouten@research.kpn.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Compile error with current CVS kernel |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:27:11 +0100 |
| Cc: | bunk@fs.tum.de (Adrian Bunk), linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <200103131818.TAA14585@sparta.research.kpn.com>; from K.H.C.vanHouten@research.kpn.com on Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:18:05PM +0100 |
| References: | <20010313152236.B1208@bacchus.dhis.org> <200103131818.TAA14585@sparta.research.kpn.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:18:05PM +0100, Karel van Houten wrote: > > That's scary - these sections are explicitly mentioned in the linker > > script and yet ld places them near address zero. Oh pleassure, oh > > garbage. > > > > This can probably be fixed by changing the ldscript; can experiment what > > it takes to get your ld to place all sections with a LOAD attribute placed > > next to each other? My ld behaves fine. > > Can you point me to a binutils version and/or patches that should > behave OK for native compiles? It's not native vs. crosscompile; this problem with binutils hits in both cases and only older versions (which aren't suitable for use with glibc 2.2 ...) are not affected. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Compile error with current CVS kernel, Pete Popov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | linuxmips.ichilton.co.uk Downtime, Ian Chilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Compile error with current CVS kernel, Karel van Houten |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Compile error with current CVS kernel, Karel van Houten |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |