| To: | Klaus Naumann <spock@mgnet.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Failure 2.4.2 + glibc 2.2 still illegal instruction |
| From: | Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org> |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:52:08 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103102131450.24319-100000@spock.mgnet.de>; from spock@mgnet.de on Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 09:34:00PM +0100 |
| Organization: | rfc822 - pure communication |
| References: | <20010310205028.B16121@paradigm.rfc822.org> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103102131450.24319-100000@spock.mgnet.de> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 09:34:00PM +0100, Klaus Naumann wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> I have also seen these things with tar and other stuff.
> Anyway - Keith said that it went away after he compiled
> glibc against 2.4.X (X > 1) kernel sources. Can
> anyone confirm that ?
>
> > strace shows that the last system call called is
> > "sysmips(MIPS_ATOMIC_SET, ...)"
>
> I have tried building strace but failed. What is your code base ?
I am still using the very old strace 3.2 from the cobalt
distribution which is aehm - complicated - as i wont decode
everything and some things even wrong.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912
Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Failure 2.4.2 + glibc 2.2 still illegal instruction, Klaus Naumann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Illegal instruction - a workaround or fix ?, Florian Lohoff |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Failure 2.4.2 + glibc 2.2 still illegal instruction, Klaus Naumann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Failure 2.4.2 + glibc 2.2 still illegal instruction, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |