linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bug in get_insn_opcode.

To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: Bug in get_insn_opcode.
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 20:48:26 +0100
Cc: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103031614440.455-100000@cassiopeia.home>; from geert@linux-m68k.org on Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 04:15:05PM +0100
References: <20010303082115.B5750@bacchus.dhis.org> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103031614440.455-100000@cassiopeia.home>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 04:15:05PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> > > Index: arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /home/repository/sw/linux-2.4.0/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.10
> > > diff -u -r1.10 traps.c
> > > --- traps.c     2001/02/28 13:46:43     1.10
> > > +++ traps.c     2001/03/02 16:50:27
> > 
> > Patch will behave (un-)funny on a cvs diff generated patch like this which
> > lacks full pathnames in the --- and +++ lines.  Patches for this
> > behaviour are available on ftp.cyclic.com (so it still exists ...) or in
> > more recent cvs rpms.
> 
> Isn't patch supposed to look at the `Index' line?

Only when the environment variable POSIXLY_CORRECT is set to y which has
a ton of other unwanted side effects, so patch would need wrapper scripts
or what not else.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>