On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 05:56:48PM +0100, Carsten Langgaard wrote:
> > Index: arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /home/repository/sw/linux-2.4.0/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.10
> > diff -u -r1.10 traps.c
> > --- traps.c 2001/02/28 13:46:43 1.10
> > +++ traps.c 2001/03/02 16:50:27
> Patch will behave (un-)funny on a cvs diff generated patch like this which
> lacks full pathnames in the --- and +++ lines. Patches for this
> behaviour are available on ftp.cyclic.com (so it still exists ...) or in
> more recent cvs rpms.
Isn't patch supposed to look at the `Index' line?
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- firstname.lastname@example.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds