linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bug in get_insn_opcode.

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in get_insn_opcode.
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 16:15:05 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <20010303082115.B5750@bacchus.dhis.org>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 05:56:48PM +0100, Carsten Langgaard wrote:
> > Index: arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /home/repository/sw/linux-2.4.0/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.10
> > diff -u -r1.10 traps.c
> > --- traps.c     2001/02/28 13:46:43     1.10
> > +++ traps.c     2001/03/02 16:50:27
> 
> Patch will behave (un-)funny on a cvs diff generated patch like this which
> lacks full pathnames in the --- and +++ lines.  Patches for this
> behaviour are available on ftp.cyclic.com (so it still exists ...) or in
> more recent cvs rpms.

Isn't patch supposed to look at the `Index' line?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                                                Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                                            -- Linus Torvalds


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>