| To: | michaels@jungo.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ELF header kernel module wrong? |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:39:39 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:17:42 +0200." <3A9A3B56.B0141D21@jungo.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:17:42 +0200, michaels@jungo.com wrote: >If what you say is correct, then any module created by this toolchain >would be impossible to 'insmod' Not impossible, just silently corrupted if the symbol numbers were wrong. modutils 2.3.11 added a sanity check on the number of local symbols, a version before 2.3.11 would accept any local symbol number and overrun the allocated table if the number was out of bounds. Sometimes the toolchain creates valid symbol numbers, sometimes an invalid number will not cause any problems. It is pure luck if it works. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RedHat 7.0 ?, David Cantrell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Where is 2.2.x kernel?, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ELF header kernel module wrong?, michaels |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ELF header kernel module wrong?, Brady Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |