| To: | Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Does linux support for microprocessor without MMU? |
| From: | Joe deBlaquiere <jadb@redhat.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:42:21 -0600 |
| Cc: | Crossfire <xfire@xware.cx>, kjlin <kj.lin@viditec-netmedia.com.tw>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| Organization: | Red Hat, Inc. |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.10.10102220752430.13615-100000@escobaria.sonytel.be> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-14 i686; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010217 |
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Porting the kernel isn't much worse than any other architectural port. Of course that's only a part of the story, since you'll need to port the C library (uClibc/uC-glibc) and you will have to play around with the object file format to make it work with FLAT binaries... If you're serious about doing uClinux you can find a somewhat cryptic article on porting to uClinux at:On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Joe deBlaquiere wrote:There isn't (yet) support for MIPS on uClinux.But it can't be that hard to add support for it... http://www.redhat.com/embedded/technologies/resources -- Joe |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Small remote debug kernels??, Liam Davies |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ELF header kernel module wrong?, Tom Appermont |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Does linux support for microprocessor without MMU?, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Does linux support for microprocessor without MMU?, kjlin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |