| To: | Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Filesystem corruption |
| From: | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:56:53 +0100 (MET) |
| Cc: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>, Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <E14PkTf-0003DK-00@the-village.bc.nu> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > 2.4.1 is known to cause fs corruption for all architectures; 2.4.0 should
> > actually be fine. I just reached 8 days of uptime on a 32p Origin 2000,
> > so it can't be that bad.
>
> Im tracking fs corruption and worse on 2.4.0 as well (zero page corruptions
> since 2.4.0test10 for example)
Is the zero page mapped on non-m68k architectures?
> I dont believe any 2.4 is currently 'safe'
Ugh...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Filesystem corruption, Alan Cox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Filesystem corruption, Alan Cox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Filesystem corruption, Alan Cox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Filesystem corruption, Alan Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |