linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH] drivers/net/Config.in - CONFIG_IA64_SGI_SN1 vs. $CONFIG_IA64_SGI

To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/net/Config.in - CONFIG_IA64_SGI_SN1 vs. $CONFIG_IA64_SGI_SN1#
From: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 20:29:03 +0100
Organization: rfc822 - pure communication
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
I guess this is more correct :)

Index: drivers/net/Config.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/linux/drivers/net/Config.in,v
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -r1.53 Config.in
--- drivers/net/Config.in       2001/01/11 04:02:43     1.53
+++ drivers/net/Config.in       2001/02/03 19:27:39
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
    if [ "$CONFIG_SGI_IP27" = "y" ]; then
       bool '  SGI IOC3 Ethernet' CONFIG_SGI_IOC3_ETH
    fi
-   if [ "CONFIG_IA64_SGI_SN1" = "y" ]; then
+   if [ "$CONFIG_IA64_SGI_SN1" = "y" ]; then
       bool '  SGI IOC3 Ethernet' CONFIG_SGI_IOC3_ETH
    fi
    if [ "$CONFIG_SUPERH" = "y" ]; then


-- 
Florian Lohoff                  flo@rfc822.org             +49-5201-669912
     Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [PATCH] drivers/net/Config.in - CONFIG_IA64_SGI_SN1 vs. $CONFIG_IA64_SGI_SN1#, Florian Lohoff <=