linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mips vs pcmcia - which wins?

To: Jim Freeman <jfree@sovereign.org>
Subject: Re: mips vs pcmcia - which wins?
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 09:07:56 -0800
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, dhinds@zen.stanford.edu
In-reply-to: <20010123093523.B4972@sovereign.org>; from jfree@sovereign.org on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 09:35:23AM -0700
References: <20010123093523.B4972@sovereign.org>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 09:35:23AM -0700, Jim Freeman wrote:
> From: Jim Freeman <jfree@sovereign.org>
> Date:   Tue, 23 Jan 2001 09:35:23 -0700
> To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, dhinds@zen.stanford.edu
> Subject: mips vs pcmcia - which wins?
> 
> The following mips kernel patchlet:
> 
>       diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from diff.exclude \
>               linux-2.4.0/include/linux/sched.h \
>               linux-mips.cvs/include/linux/sched.h
>       --- linux-2.4.0/include/linux/sched.h   Thu Jan  4 15:50:47 2001
>       +++ linux-mips.cvs/include/linux/sched.h        Wed Jan 10 21:52:59 2001
>       @@ -562,6 +562,8 @@
>        extern int in_group_p(gid_t);
>        extern int in_egroup_p(gid_t);
> 
>       +extern void release(struct task_struct * p);
>       +

The function getting exported here changed it's name to release_task in
2.4; I've adjusted above declaration accordingly.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>