| To: | michaels@jungo.com (Michael Shmulevich) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: User applications |
| From: | Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Jan 2001 12:17:26 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl (Maciej W. Rozycki), linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <3A5AFAC8.CA682600@jungo.com> from "Michael Shmulevich" at Jan 09, 2001 01:49:29 PM |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
> promoted to the syscall status? What is the situation that a user in its > program > would like > to call cacheflush() ? Unless, of course, he is doing DoS. A cache flush is not a denial of service attack. Its no less effective than a 1Mb memcpy > I can understand why we need this in kernel, for context switch, for example, > but > as a syscall?... Self modifying code, dynamic compilation, glibc trampolines |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: User applications, Michael Shmulevich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: User applications, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: User applications, Michael Shmulevich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: User applications, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |