[Top] [All Lists]

Re: User applications

To: (Michael Shmulevich)
Subject: Re: User applications
From: Alan Cox <>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 12:17:26 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: (Maciej W. Rozycki),
In-reply-to: <> from "Michael Shmulevich" at Jan 09, 2001 01:49:29 PM
> promoted to the syscall status? What is the situation that a user in its 
> program
> would like
> to call cacheflush() ? Unless, of course, he is doing DoS.

A cache flush is not a denial of service attack. Its no less effective than a
1Mb memcpy 

> I can understand why we need this in kernel, for context switch, for example, 
> but
> as a syscall?...

Self modifying code, dynamic compilation, glibc trampolines

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>