| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: User applications |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Jan 2001 17:43:24 +0100 (MET) |
| Cc: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>, Michael Shmulevich <michaels@jungo.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010108142729.D886@bacchus.dhis.org> |
| Organization: | Technical University of Gdansk |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > What's wrong with cacheflush(addr, count, which) that actually checks if > > <addr; addr+count> lies within the caller's address space before > > performing the flush and returns -EPERM otherwise? It would make the > > caller crawl like a turtle if it wished to but it would leave other > > processes alone. > > cacheflush(2) actually is supposed to handle things that way. Didn't I write it clearly-enough? ;-) -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available + |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: User applications, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: User applications, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: User applications, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: User applications, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |