| To: | Joe deBlaquiere <jadb@redhat.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set |
| From: | Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Dec 2000 21:53:17 +0100 |
| Cc: | the list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr |
| In-reply-to: | <3A48CC1D.9000204@redhat.com>; from Joe deBlaquiere on Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 10:49:33AM -0600 |
| References: | <3A46F4D8.9060605@redhat.com> <20001226140204.D894@bacchus.dhis.org> <3A48CC1D.9000204@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
Hi!
> > Not having swap doesn't mean you're safe. Think of any kind of previously
> > unmapped page.
> >
>
> Is there a reason why it doesn't just force that page to be mapped
> first?
You can map it in... But background daemon can map it out in the
meantime :-). You'd have to map in and pagelock.
Pavel
--
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set, Joe deBlaquiere |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set, Joe deBlaquiere |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |