[Top] [All Lists]

Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set

To: Joe deBlaquiere <>, Ralf Baechle <>
Subject: Re: sysmips call and glibc atomic set
From: Pavel Machek <>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 21:53:17 +0100
Cc: the list <>,,
In-reply-to: <>; from Joe deBlaquiere on Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 10:49:33AM -0600
References: <> <> <>

> > Not having swap doesn't mean you're safe.  Think of any kind of previously
> > unmapped page.
> > 
> Is there a reason why it doesn't just force that page to be mapped
> first?

You can map it in... But background daemon can map it out in the
meantime :-). You'd have to map in and pagelock.

I'm "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>