| To: | "Juan J. Quintela" <quintela@fi.udc.es> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] DEC init_cycle_counter |
| From: | Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org> |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Dec 2000 14:14:05 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <yttwvdjj7r8.fsf@serpe.mitica>; from quintela@fi.udc.es on Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 02:02:51PM +0100 |
| Organization: | rfc822 - pure communication |
| References: | <20001202132748.A2002@paradigm.rfc822.org> <yttwvdjj7r8.fsf@serpe.mitica> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 02:02:51PM +0100, Juan J. Quintela wrote:
> You delete the definition of cyclecounter_available and you mantain
> one of its uses ..... that is a no-no, I will bet that with that
> patch, this don't compile (and less it works .....).
>
It actually compiles but i cant test due to the TLB and swapping stuff.
This whole cyle_counter stuff has moved to the generic mips time.c
in arch/mips/kernel/time.c and seemed to be a complete code duplication.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912
Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Support for smaller glibc, Alan Cox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] DEC init_cycle_counter, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] DEC init_cycle_counter, Juan J. Quintela |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] DEC init_cycle_counter, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |