| To: | ralf@oss.sgi.com (Ralf Baechle) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Support for smaller glibc |
| From: | Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:06:28 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr |
| In-reply-to: | <20001202050306.A12319@bacchus.dhis.org> from "Ralf Baechle" at Dec 02, 2000 05:03:06 AM |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
> > solved. But forking a smaller libc of standard glibc is nothing but the > > St. Florian's principle ... > > Ulrich is refusing to do anything with it. Do you have any suggestions? > I will do my best to do it right. But I am afraid I cannot do it alone. Ulrich is right. Start from a library that is intended to be modular and embedded. Folks are already looking at using newlib for this. Alan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] DEC init_cycle_counter, Juan J. Quintela |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] DEC init_cycle_counter, Florian Lohoff |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Support for smaller glibc, Martin Michlmayr |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Support for smaller glibc, Eric Jorgensen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |