linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ...

from [Ralf Baechle] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Jay Carlson <nop@nop.com>
Subject: Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ...
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:30:10 +0200
Cc: Mike Klar <mfklar@ponymail.com>, Jay Carlson <nop@place.org>, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <KEEOIBGCMINLAHMMNDJNOECBCAAA.nop@nop.com>; from nop@nop.com on Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 07:26:19AM -0400
References: <NDBBIDGAOKMNJNDAHDDMAENPCMAA.mfklar@ponymail.com> <KEEOIBGCMINLAHMMNDJNOECBCAAA.nop@nop.com>
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com 
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 07:26:19AM -0400, Jay Carlson wrote:

> Does anyone know if gcc 2.97 can build glibc 2.0.x?

I'm using a glibc snapshot of about two weeks ago which seems to work fine
for glibc.  I however suspect it's making Emacs die and Emacs addicts
keep insisting that this isn't within spec ;-)

  Ralf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RE: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ..., Jay Carlson
Next by Date:  Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ..., Maciej W. Rozycki
Previous by Thread:  RE: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ..., Jay Carlson
Next by Thread:  Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ..., Ralf Baechle
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]