| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ... |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Oct 2000 06:21:00 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20001014055550.B3816@bacchus.dhis.org>; from ralf@oss.sgi.com on Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:55:50AM +0200 |
| References: | <39E7EB73.9206D0DB@mvista.com> <20001014055550.B3816@bacchus.dhis.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:55:50AM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > 1. binutils > > ----------- > > > > a) latest binutil cvs tree (v2.10) + debian patch > > > > http://sourceware.cygnus.com/binutils/ > > ftp://ftp.rfc822.org/pub/local/debian-mips/patches/rel32-binutils.diff > > > > b) Andreas Jaeger recommanded Ulf's patch against the CVS tree. He > > recommanded > > > > ftp://oss.sgi.com/pub/linux/mips/src/binutils/binutils-000420.diff.gz. > > > > But I only found the following file. > > > > ftp://oss.sgi.com/pub/linux/mips/binutils/binutils-000424.diff.gz > > The binutils paragraph is old new. All of the required patches are now > in binutils except one which I sent to Ulf yesterday. So Ulf commited the patch into the binutils cvs. Therefore no more pending patches for binutils-current. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ld problem, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ld problem, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ..., Florian Lohoff |
| Next by Thread: | RE: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ..., Jay Carlson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |