| To: | Ian Chilton <mailinglist@ichilton.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ld problem |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Oct 2000 14:13:32 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20001014130452.B28429@woody.ichilton.co.uk>; from mailinglist@ichilton.co.uk on Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 01:04:52PM +0100 |
| References: | <20001014011056.A27588@woody.ichilton.co.uk> <20001014123233.B4407@bacchus.dhis.org> <20001014130452.B28429@woody.ichilton.co.uk> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 01:04:52PM +0100, Ian Chilton wrote: > > Which is probably the root of the evil - I assume at the point when it's > > crashing the new /etc/ld.so.conf file is still incomplete. I don't have > > a theory what's causing that, sorry. > > Do you think it could be something to do with the glibc-2.0.6-5lm? > > or, what about ld.so? I think I compiled v1.9.9 That explains it. Don't use the ld.so package at all. glibc has it's own dynamic linker. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4 Kernel Problem on Indy, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: stable binutils, gcc, glibc ..., Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ld problem, Ian Chilton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ld problem, Ian Chilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |