| To: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Patches for CVS Glibc, Binutils, GCC |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Oct 2000 23:05:20 +0200 |
| Cc: | Ian Chilton <mailinglist@ichilton.co.uk>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <39E66230.C6010B25@mvista.com>; from jsun@mvista.com on Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 06:15:28PM -0700 |
| References: | <20001011181738.A22525@woody.ichilton.co.uk> <20001012063012.A14443@bacchus.dhis.org> <20001012154830.A24509@woody.ichilton.co.uk> <39E66230.C6010B25@mvista.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 06:15:28PM -0700, Jun Sun wrote: > > humm...any chance you could have a directory on oss, where you always stick > > the patches when they are updated...maybe also a text file, with the date > > it was last changed... > I agree. A common way of doing it is to have a patch named after a > date, which inidicates the patch can be applied against the CVS tree on > that date. In general all those patches are only fairly shortlived. They're intended to be tested and will then go into back to their original maintainers. And probably noone of the hackers really like producing a large extra administrative overhead to extra bookkeeping work ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Patches for CVS Glibc, Binutils, GCC, Jun Sun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: modutils bug? 'if' clause executes incorrectly, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Patches for CVS Glibc, Binutils, GCC, Jun Sun |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Patches for CVS Glibc, Binutils, GCC, Florian Lohoff |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |