| To: | Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: One more gcc patch |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Sep 2000 01:08:46 +0200 |
| Cc: | Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@engr.sgi.com>, Keith M Wesolowski <wesolows@foobazco.org>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr |
| In-reply-to: | <u8ya0xbnao.fsf@gromit.rhein-neckar.de>; from aj@suse.de on Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 06:14:07PM +0200 |
| References: | <20000908205810.A11920@bacchus.dhis.org> <u8ya0xbnao.fsf@gromit.rhein-neckar.de> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 06:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Did you run the testsuite? No; I tried rebuilding a large number of RH 6.2 packages. A few of them are broken in ways that make me suspect the compiler is broken. Might also be binutils; I did upgrade both in one step. > It doesn't seem to fix C++: > > === libstdc++ Summary === > > # of expected passes 9 > # of unexpected failures 10 > # of expected failures 11 > > The number for g++ are even worse, I stopped the check > > Any idea how to get C++ working? Debugging? I think historically nobody did ever invest time into getting the libg++ to work so we somewhen have to pay that price ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: One more gcc patch, Andreas Jaeger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: do_page_fault crash on Indigo2, Greg McGary |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: One more gcc patch, Andreas Jaeger |
| Next by Thread: | do_page_fault crash on Indigo2, Greg McGary |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |