| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MIPS symbol versioning patches |
| From: | Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@calypso.engr.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:20:43 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | "J. Scott Kasten" <jsk@tetracon-eng.net>, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20000630023352.E15960@bacchus.dhis.org> |
| References: | <14671.21669.3126.181895@calypso.engr.sgi.com> <Pine.SGI.4.10.10006291446000.17956-100000@thor.tetracon-eng.net> <14683.40873.494836.164828@calypso.engr.sgi.com> <20000630023352.E15960@bacchus.dhis.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com |
> > Yes, it's just a matter of recompiling everything against it. Keith > > Wesolowski is doing this. We have found some minor problems with > > glibc that we haven't been able to resolve yet. There is some bug in > > the dynamic linker, it tries to resolve symbols that aren't there in > > some packages. > > > > There is also a problem with compiling gcc 2.96 natively, but I > > actually think that's a problem in gcc 2.96. It shouldn't try to > > generate jump instructions like it does that in PIC code. > > What jump instructions? jal goes ok, the assembler knows how expand > them correctly for PIC code. It uses j to perform branches that are out of range. I think gcc expects the assembler to translate it into a GOT16/LO16 thing if it's out of range. Ulf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Status reports?, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] microsecond timers for IP22, Keith M Wesolowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MIPS symbol versioning patches, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MIPS symbol versioning patches, Andreas Jaeger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |