linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: cross Mips64-linux binutils problem

To: Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@calypso.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: cross Mips64-linux binutils problem
From: jimix@pobox.com (Jimi X)
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 10:59:36 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005241637480.15277-100000@calypso.engr.sgi.com>
References: <14636.15579.327225.215562@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005241637480.15277-100000@calypso.engr.sgi.com>
Reply-to: jimix@watson.ibm.com
Sender: owner-linuxmips@oss.sgi.com
>>>>> "UC" == Ulf Carlsson <ulfc@calypso.engr.sgi.com> writes:

 >> I'm using binutils-19990825 patched with binutils-19991011.diff
 UC> I have used that patch together with the binutils CVS from
 UC> 19991011 and that worked for me.  At least for building 32-bit
 UC> kernel.

Well, I'm only interested in 64-bit static only. I'm not ready for
shared yet either.

 >> They were obtained from:
 >> ftp://ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/linux/mips/crossdev/src/mips64/
 >>
 >> Are these the latest? If so please read on..

 UC> You could try my superpatch that I have on oss.sgi.com.  It's a
 UC> newer than Ralf's patch that you have:

 UC>
 UC>    ftp://oss.sgi.com/pub/linux/mips/src/binutils/binutils-000424.diff.gz

thanks I will try and let you know.

BTW: what are your people using to build the mip64 linux kernel changes 
that went in a few months ago?

-Jimi X

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>