[Top] [All Lists]

[Fwd: BOUNCE Non-member submission from [J

Subject: [Fwd: BOUNCE Non-member submission from [Jun Sun <>]]
From: Nancy Bigham <>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 11:02:56 -0700
Organization: Linux

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: BOUNCE    Non-member submission from
[Jun Sun <>]
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: owner-linux@cthulhu
To: owner-linux@cthulhu

>From owner-linux  Tue May 16 10:49:55 2000
Received: from ( [])
        by (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF)
        via ESMTP id KAA52215
        for <>;
        Tue, 16 May 2000 10:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
        mail_from (
Received: from ( []) 
        by (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam:
       SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary
       systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email
       from the Internet.) 
        via ESMTP id KAA06183
        for <>; Tue, 16 May 2000 10:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
        mail_from (
Received: from ( [])
        by (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22202;
        Tue, 16 May 2000 10:49:43 -0700
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:49:08 -0700
From: Jun Sun <>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20b i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ralf Baechle <>
Subject: Re: HELP : ptrace returns puzzling results
References: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 11:46:20AM -0700, Jun Sun wrote:
> > I am writing a gdbserver for linux/mips.  The server can now talk with
> > the gdb client, and can run to completion if you press 'c'.
> > reg #29 ($29,sp) = 2147483120 (0x7ffffdf0)
> The value of sp looks sane, it a value near the absolute top of the stack
> at 0x80000000.
> > reg #37 ($64,pc) = 263607008 (0x0fb652e0)
> Also looks sane at first look, this value is in the typical address range
> where the dynamic linker gets mapped.
> Many of the registers in the dump you gave have a value of zero and that is
> worrying me much more.  All the caller saved registers are zero, that
> smells.

I looked at the problem again.  The registers are actually correct. 
Most registers are zero becase that is the program start up time (in
exec()). I now can set a breakpoint and run until that breakpoint.

However, step or next or setting another breakpoint do not work.  It
appears that gdbserver calls ptrace with PTRACE_SINGLESTEP option, which
is not implemented in the kernel I am using (it is v2.3.99-pre3).  Is
this implemented in the latest version?  If not, is it difficult to add
one?  Or can we get around without it?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>