| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pause() |
| From: | Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:53:03 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu, aj@suse.de |
| In-reply-to: | <20000331151555.A5911@uni-koblenz.de>; from Ralf Baechle on Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:15:55PM +0200 |
| Organization: | rfc822 - pure communication |
| References: | <20000331151555.A5911@uni-koblenz.de> |
| Sender: | owner-linuxmips@oss.sgi.com |
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:15:55PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > I just found another brainfart in the libc / kernel interface. In the > believe libc wouldn't use the pause(2) syscall any longer I removed it. > This makes a number of programs like screen burn all CPU they can get. > I'll provide two fixes, one to libc and a second for the kernel and > either one will be sufficient. Could this also be the cause of "top" refreshing the screen as fast as it can ? I noticed that when i rebuild the debian procps package and tried top ... It then consumes the cpu it gets ... Flo -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5241-470566 "Technology is a constant battle between manufacturers producing bigger and more idiot-proof systems and nature producing bigger and better idiots." |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | kernel for indigo2, Florian Lohoff |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: kernel for indigo2, Richard |
| Previous by Thread: | kernel for indigo2, Florian Lohoff |
| Next by Thread: | SNI RW320 (aka SGI Indigo?), Jan-Benedict Glaw |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |