| To: | ralf@oss.sgi.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question about copy_from_user() |
| From: | Hiroyuki Machida <machida@sm.sony.co.jp> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Feb 2000 11:04:36 +0900 |
| Cc: | linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20000218121957.G5234@uni-koblenz.de> |
| References: | <20000216183429L.machida@sm.sony.co.jp> <20000218121957.G5234@uni-koblenz.de> |
| Sender: | owner-linuxmips@oss.sgi.com |
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> Subject: Re: Question about copy_from_user() Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:19:57 +0100 > As you say $at is being used for the exception handling, so it obviously > isn't redundant as you say. Or do I missunderstand what you were trying > to express? Thanks, Ralf. I had miss-understood. I understood that $AT at the copy_from_user is still meaningful. --- Hiroyuki Machida |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Linux on O2?, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CVS Update@oss.sgi.com: linux, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question about copy_from_user(), Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | oss.sgi.com CVS kernel doesn compile for DEC, Florian Lohoff |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |