| To: | Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: HI16 / LO16 relocations. |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de> |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Aug 1999 01:01:00 +0200 |
| Cc: | binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu |
| In-reply-to: | <19990803154236N.mitchell@codesourcery.com>; from Mark Mitchell on Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:42:36PM -0700 |
| References: | <19990804000908.A7145@uni-koblenz.de> <19990803154236N.mitchell@codesourcery.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:42:36PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > As soon as you get a test-case, I'll take a look at this. It's fine > even it's big, as long as you can point at the exact place that goes > wrong; I'd really like to get this work behind me, and get everything > back to a more stable state. 've compiled *millions* of lines of code > on IRIX6 with the new linker without a problem; obviously the > relocation patterns are very different from the N32/N64 ABI to the > older ABIs. I think the core differences are probably that I tried to compile non-pic code and code which tries to use GNU extensions. I intend to recompile the entire Linux distribution with this new linker which probably will trigger a few more bugs according to my past experience. Finally the Linux/MIPS64 kernel will exercise non-PIC 64-bit code - hopefully without triggering any new bugs ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | HI16 / LO16 relocations., Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Anyone ported Linux to the NEC DDB-VRC4737 evaluation board?, Graham Stoney |
| Previous by Thread: | HI16 / LO16 relocations., Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Anyone ported Linux to the NEC DDB-VRC4737 evaluation board?, Graham Stoney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |