| To: | Tim Hockin <thockin@cobaltnet.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: gp |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Jul 1999 03:35:36 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <378E2FEF.6E82871A@cobaltnet.com>; from Tim Hockin on Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 12:01:03PM -0700 |
| References: | <378E2FEF.6E82871A@cobaltnet.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 12:01:03PM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote: > just playing around with kernel, and wondering what (if any) work has > been done to use gp within the kernel. I know it is built with -G 0 > now. > > I looked into it, and made sure that gp got saved and restored correctly > (I think), but when I compile with -G > 0 gcc (or egcs) gets signal 11 - > ideas? In Linux 2.1 / 2.2 we have an other use of the gp; it contains the current variable. See include/asm-mips/current.h. It's been on my to do list for a long time to check if -G > 0 will be a better use of $28 than putting the current variable there. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Float / Double issues - solved, perhaps, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 200mhz indy, Eric Melville |
| Previous by Thread: | gp, Tim Hockin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 200mhz indy, Eric Melville |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |