| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@uni-koblenz.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IRIX binary compatibility (Was: Re: X VNC server compiled on Hardhat!!) |
| From: | "William J. Earl" <wje@fir.engr.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:08:31 -0700 |
| Cc: | digital convergence <digital_convergence@yahoo.com>, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu |
| In-reply-to: | <19990614123809.C14977@uni-koblenz.de> |
| References: | <19990614043723.24062.rocketmail@web502.yahoomail.com> <19990614123809.C14977@uni-koblenz.de> |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
Ralf Baechle writes:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 09:37:23PM -0700, digital convergence wrote:
>
> > btw, how well is native IRIX binary loading supported? I wish to run a
> > copy of BMRT on my farm of indy's under linux, but it won't let me
> > execute any of the binaries (they're R4000 optimised old style linkage
> > bins)....
>
> Only a limited number of syscalls and other interfaces is supported at
> all and I haven't received any reports about the IRIX compatibility
> stuff in ages. Anybody interested in maintaining this facility?
IRIX 4.* binaries are COFF binaries, not ELF, and have a very
different ABI from IRIX 5.* binaries. The present support is really
for IRIX 5 binaries, which are much closer in interface semantics to
Linux native binaries.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | IRIX Partations with HardHat Linux, Shane W. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Memory corruption, William J. Earl |
| Previous by Thread: | IRIX binary compatibility (Was: Re: X VNC server compiled on Hardhat!!), Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Spare Indigo2 system?, Jesse MacNish |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |