| To: | ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: NTools ENewsFlash -- Report: NT 3.5x Faster Than Linux |
| From: | alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Apr 1999 21:09:26 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <199904141820.LAA81406@oz.engr.sgi.com> from "Ariel Faigon" at Apr 14, 99 11:20:47 am |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
Oh they did a very professional hatchet job. But then these are the people who are responsible for a whole pile of such things. They picked a kernel carefully chosen to have an NT TCP performance interoperability bug. They mistuned the linux box completely. They claim to have checked on the net but mindscape never touched the linux.org.uk web site since 1998 etc. Whats very funny of course is Microsoft's Halloween II document is one of the many things that contradicts this survey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Errors building..., Harald Koerfgen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: NTools ENewsFlash -- Report: NT 3.5x Faster Than Linux, Matthias Kleinschmidt |
| Previous by Thread: | NTools ENewsFlash -- Report: NT 3.5x Faster Than Linux, Ariel Faigon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NTools ENewsFlash -- Report: NT 3.5x Faster Than Linux, Matthias Kleinschmidt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |