Hi,
On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 11:20:47AM -0700, Ariel Faigon wrote:
> [I'm forwarding a message that bounced. Just thought some people
> may be interested. To add to what Eric wrote, another thing that
> I find strange is that they are comparing NT 3.5 rather than the
> latest NT 4.x to Linux. I also believe some of the results
> are missing crucial details, like how the two very different
> web servers were configured (e.g. standalone vs from inetd,
> ssi turned on etc.) who paid for the report, full disclosures...
> -- Ariel]
I think that this is not the right list to discuss this strange report
but anyhow a few comments:
- The report was sponsored by Microsoft as you can read here:
http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html#mccert
- Mindcraft compared Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 and Novell NetWare 5 in
January. Here you can find Novells response:
http://www.novell.com/advantage/nw5/nw5-mindcraftcheck.html
Matthias
--
Matthias Kleinschmidt
Cedar Dell 568B, Box 5398
UMass Dartmouth
285 Old Westport Rd.
North Dartmouth, MA 02747
Tel.: +1 508 910 6851
email: matthias@fmc-container.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de
pgpC6RYZ8R4FL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|