Personally, since SGI made the questionable decision to port to NT, I
wish they would commit to AMD's processors instead of Intels. The K7 is
going to be a real screamer and at significantly lower prices than
Intel, always at least 25% less by company dictate. Their floating
point has nearly caught up with Intel, too.
I also wish that SGI would put Irix or Linux with all the Irix tools on
the PC-based box.
Porting to NT alone is probably not enough to save the company. It
didn't work for Intergraph.
BTW, how does the graphic performance on the VPC compare to, say,
Reality Engine or Infinite Reality?
David S. Miller wrote:
> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 23:40:30 -0500
> From: Eric Kimminau <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> As for "screwing their customers", ask Sun when they are going to
> support NT on any of their systems.
> Never, whats so wrong with that? To quote their VP of desktops "One
> more Linux user is one less NT user." I think this makes their stance
> on NT pretty obvious. Also look at their position in the M$ trial.
> They have things like WABI, which runs on Sparc right now, so if you
> just need the M$ applications, you can run them.
> At least SGI is making it possible to start thinking about doing
> UNIX environment kinds of tasks in the NT world rather than
> snubbing their nose at the people who have made the business
> decision to migrate to that environment.
> If everyone jumps off a bridge, should we follow right after them?
> I think the problem is the direction of the thinking here. Why do we
> need to bring Unix to NT, if all users want is both environments and
> the applications, then bring NT to Unix since we know Unix is better
> (sic) and has fewer fallacies than NT does.
> As for "no UNIX story" on the 320 or 540 hardware, all I can say is
> that there have been a lot of Linux rumors. Nothing substantiated.
> And here is the point I was trying to make, rumors aren't going to get
> anywhere. SGI is taking too long to commit if they do have something
> in the pipeline, everything is up in the air, and the best this does
> is either:
> 1) Give the rumors (right or wrong) more weight than an official
> statement, until such a statement is made.
> 2) Put question marks above the heads of everyone else.
> HP uses Intel CPU's. Compaq now owns DEC. Who says SGI has to own
> the company that makes the CPU's we put in our systems?
> I never said that. All I said was that it would have been wiser to
> give users a one SGI platform family migration scheme, ie. have a
> family of MIPS machine that ran what the next generation machine would
> (even if only at such a level to assure successful ports)... It's
> like the difference between:
> 1) A bomb is about to drop, assume the position.
> 2) A bomb is dropping in a month, here are the tools and resources to
> build a shelter for yourselves so you are prepared.
> For being an SGI supporter, this sure sounds like Sun FUD, IMHO.
> I am a supporter, but this does not mean I need to close my eyes when
> I believe very bad decisions are being made. That would make me a
> sheep. I think SGI's stalling is a mistake, so I'm going to talk
> about it.
> When I was an intern at SGI, I told people things like this. I'm very
> outspoken, and I'll tell people when they make mistakes, and I'll also
> make suggestions about future decisions when I am listened to about
> such matters.
> The "everyone else's shit stinks except mine" mentality has been the
> source of failure behind a few engineering teams and companies out
> there. I think SGI is doing some cool stuff, the hardware looks
> impressive. I also think Sun is doing a lot of nice stuff too. I
> choose to learn from what both of them are doing, instead of being a
> blind pundit for one or the other.
> David S. Miller