Ariel Faigon wrote:
> I'm not sure if I should feel amused or saddened by this
> email. I'm not a lawyer, just curious of what would you
> be doing in reponse.
> Note that:
> The facts this email presents are inaccurate:
> 1) We don't have any "product" on www.linux.sgi.com
> just a free source distribution.
> 2) His claim is ignoring the fact that "Linux" is
> a trademark of Linus Torvalds which may invalidate
> any claim to its derivatives by another party.
> 3) We use "Hard Hat 5.1" as a humorous way to say
> it is somewhat unstable release of Red Hat 5.1
> in a casual way in one title.
> 4) We never use the term "Hard Hat Linux".
I believe the installer uses the term `Hard Hat Linux', even on the
RH-sold Rough Cuts CD. We should really rebuild that properly, and I
know Alex was talking about doing just that. puffin?
[shaver@zamboni sbin]$ strings install2 | grep Hard\ Hat
Hard Hat Linux, portions (C) 1998 Red Hat Software
(now, back to efs_read_inode_direct)