linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: GNU/Hurd

from [Alan Cox] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: torbjorn.gannholm@fra.se (Torbjörn Gannholm)
Subject: Re: GNU/Hurd
From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 21:28:47 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <365E60FE.F12615EC@fra.se> from "Torbjörn Gannholm" at Nov 27, 98 09:21:19 am
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com 
> But still, why wouldn't some implementation of HURD (or mach) be able to be
> preemptible?

I believe its been done for MACH so that MACH tasks are hard real time. FOr
hard real time on Linux Rtlinux sits under the kernel and runs as a very
compact realtime microkernel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: GNU/Hurd, Alan Cox <=
Next by Date:  proper glibc source rpms., Alex deVries
Next by Thread:  proper glibc source rpms., Alex deVries
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]