| To: | alexvk@vostok.engr.sgi.com (Alex Kozlov) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: help offered |
| From: | "William J. Earl" <wje@fir.engr.sgi.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Nov 1998 14:25:24 -0800 |
| Cc: | pjlahaie@atlsci.com, ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, galibert@pobox.com, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <199811252213.OAA07424@vostok.engr.sgi.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.04.9811251542540.3207-100000@elenuial.atlsci.com> <199811252213.OAA07424@vostok.engr.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
Alex Kozlov writes:
> pjlahaie@atlsci.com wrote:
> >
> > I was under the impression the O2k memory bandwidth was limited to
> > ~800MB/s. If so, even if you can read 4GB/s what are you foing to do with
> > it? It would have to go over the CrayLink "network" and that doesn't do
> > 4GB/s. The only way I can see 4GB/s disk throughput is multiple of the
> > node accessing "local" drives and adding all the bandwidth together.
> >
>
> I thought craylink is 6 GB/s:
>
> cl0: flags=4041<UP,RUNNING,DRVRLOCK>
> inet 192.0.2.113 netmask 0xffffff00
> speed 6.40 Gbit/s
>
> Is it not true in practice?
Yes, but I think the "4GB/s" was "4 gigabytes/second". The link is
about 800 megabytes/second (6.4 gigabits/second).
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: help offered, pjlahaie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: help offered, Greg Chesson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: help offered, pjlahaie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: help offered, ralf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |