| To: | ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: help offered |
| From: | alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Nov 1998 21:46:54 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | galibert@pobox.com, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <199811252037.MAA37649@oz.engr.sgi.com> from "Ariel Faigon" at Nov 25, 98 12:37:36 pm |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
> :Linux 2.1.* is very preemtible, even if there are stil some things to > :do. Umm > : > > Interesting. Could you elaborate on: > > 0) What was changed in recent Linux kernels > to support preemtibility in kernel space? Nothing > 1) Which "serious" (i.e not 'getpid') system calls are > now reentrant ? signals, scheduling related stuff > 2) What still remains to be done so Linux can really > scale before it gets bottlenecked by kernel locks ? Actually it scales fine to 4 CPUs for most stuff on Intel. The pieces that dont scale are memory intensive and the intel hardware doesnt scale either 8) But from a theoretical point of view the page cache, vm and fs layers dont scale. Alan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: help offered, Greg Chesson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: help offered, pjlahaie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: help offered, Ariel Faigon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: help offered, Greg Chesson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |