| To: | Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@execpc.com>, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: R5000 Unused memory (was: R4000SC...) |
| From: | ralf@uni-koblenz.de |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Oct 1998 05:57:31 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <19981022194442.27891@execpc.com>; from Mitchell Blank Jr on Thu, Oct 22, 1998 at 07:44:42PM -0500 |
| References: | <19981017104618.A3076@zigzegv.ml.org> <19981018111145.J4768@uni-koblenz.de> <19981019111501.A16024@zigzegv.ml.org> <1998102010305 <19981020103052.G676@uni-koblenz.de> <19981021134544.A30452@zigzegv.ml.org> <19981021233814.A3030@alpha.franken.de> <19981022090933.A879@bun.falkenberg.se> <362F69B5.AB94E713@xmission.com> <19981022194442.27891@execpc.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
On Thu, Oct 22, 1998 at 07:44:42PM -0500, Mitchell Blank Jr wrote: > Eric Jorgensen wrote: > > Yes and no. Personally I find the concept of running a modern system > > without available swap somewhat perilous. > > What about if you don't have any disk nor any rw filesystems? Not unusual > in imbedded applications. The only way to get around it now apparently is > to set up a ram disk and swap to that -- hardly effecient or useful > (except in the case where some RAM is slower). > > A typical UNIX workstation or server should always have swap -- there are > always some gettys or something that might as well be swapped out to make > room for more disk cache. There are applications, however, where swap > is just not an option. Linux cannot swap to NFS, so that behaviour in absence is pretty much a showstopper for diskless apps. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Partial Success Report, Thomas Bogendoerfer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MIPS R3230?, ralf |
| Previous by Thread: | (fwd) was bug in haifa scheduler (or not), Ariel Faigon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MIPS R3230?, ralf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |