| To: | linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: utmp.h |
| From: | "Francis M. J. Hsieh" <mjhsieh@helix.life.nthu.edu.tw> |
| Date: | Sun, 19 Jul 1998 22:18:58 +0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <19980719152050.B415@uni-koblenz.de>; from ralf@uni-koblenz.de on Sun, Jul 19, 1998 at 03:20:50PM +0200 |
| References: | <19980719184144.26798@life.nthu.edu.tw> <19980719152050.B415@uni-koblenz.de> |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
On Sun, Jul 19, 1998 at 03:20:50PM +0200, ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote: > It's that way because changing the structure to what the other architectures > are using would break the binary compatibility for not that much benefit. > I did so because glibc has already been the only libc for MIPS when other > architectures were still relying only on H.J. Lu's Linux Libc aka libc 5. > > It's on the to do list for libc 7 and I think we've got still quite some > time before we take that step. hmmm... Okay, maybe i should change the source (seems to be a hard work) to fit my need. -- Francis |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: utmp.h, ralf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | benchmark........, Francis M. J. Hsieh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: utmp.h, ralf |
| Next by Thread: | benchmark........, Francis M. J. Hsieh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |