On Sun, Jul 19, 1998 at 03:20:50PM +0200, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> It's that way because changing the structure to what the other architectures
> are using would break the binary compatibility for not that much benefit.
> I did so because glibc has already been the only libc for MIPS when other
> architectures were still relying only on H.J. Lu's Linux Libc aka libc 5.
> It's on the to do list for libc 7 and I think we've got still quite some
> time before we take that step.
hmmm... Okay, maybe i should change the source (seems to be a hard work)
to fit my need.