| To: | Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Could mounting sdc instead of sdc1 have solved my panics? |
| From: | ralf@uni-koblenz.de |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Apr 1998 00:47:40 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
| In-reply-to: | <m0yUfJq-000aNhC@the-village.bc.nu>; from Alan Cox on Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 11:27:13PM +0100 |
| References: | <19980430002810.03127@uni-koblenz.de> <m0yUfJq-000aNhC@the-village.bc.nu> |
| Sender: | owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com |
On Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 11:27:13PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > I don't see any reason why the kernel should crash when using sdc instead of > > a partition. So I forward this to linux-kernel in the hope anybody knows. > > My Indy has always been on /dev/sdb - anyone who has met the SGI command > line disk partitioner can probably guess why. So far its worked ;) Fact is that two kernels, the one Alex built from linux-cvs and the one which I built yesterday for myself, both significantly different and both 2.1.91 derived, crashed. Each time disassembling showed that somehow a NULL pointer ended up in the SCSI scatter-gather lists which where passed to dma_setup in the sgiwd93. No idea why; I've never seen that bug myself. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Rex and the Newport., Olivier Galibert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Rex and the Newport., Alan Cox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Could mounting sdc instead of sdc1 have solved my panics?, Alan Cox |
| Next by Thread: | MIPS/Linux port for strace, Alex deVries |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |