On Thu, 23 Apr 1998 email@example.com wrote:
> > > Alex, still working on porting Redhat 5.0? 5.1 ante portas ...
> > When the 5.1 SRPMs start rolling out by the end of the month, I'll start
> > building them. I'vea 'spare' 3GB SCSI disk, so things should be a lot
> > easier to do than last time. It would be ultra cool if we could get the
> > whole thing ported over a number of days after RH 5.1 comes out.
> Ok. In that case we should add a fat readme that RH 5.0 is incomplete and
> 4.9.1 should be used or maybe even rm -rf redhat-5.0/. It's confusing
Yes, it is confusing. Especially because there are just gaping holes in
packages (like glibc) for 5.0.
But I wouldn't say that 5.0 is broken, just that the missing things need
to come from 4.9.1.
Anyway, it'll all be fixed when we go through and redo all of 5.1. We can
make sure that we include everything like glibc.
> > Hm. I also have a Mac IIcx to distract me.
> Your Indy is _way_ faster than that brick ;-)
It's amazing how hack value can outshine performance. Some people think
it's what keeps the i386 port of Linux alive.